Editorial principles
About PureSupplyHQ
PureSupplyHQ is an independent educational publication. Our editorial team explains health research and ingredient evidence in plain language, with the limits of the available data made clear.
Our vision
Accessible scientific literacy
We believe readers deserve clear access to how health research is conducted and what it shows. Our aim is to build scientific literacy, so that questions about ingredients and health claims can be weighed against the evidence rather than against marketing.
Every article is written to explain methods, sample limitations and points of uncertainty, not only headline findings. We publish on the understanding that a clear account of what is unknown is as useful as a summary of what is established.
Editorial standards
How we verify and cite evidence
Evidence verification
Content relies exclusively on indexed medical journals, systematic reviews, and regulatory registries. Each claim is traced to its primary source before publication, and secondary reporting is not treated as evidence.
Literature hierarchy
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are weighted above single studies, and well-designed trials above observational work. Animal and in vitro findings are labelled as preliminary and are never presented as established human outcomes.
Independence and conflicts
PureSupplyHQ operates strictly as an educational resource free from commercial sponsorship. We do not accept payment for coverage, and authors must disclose any financial or professional ties to the subjects they review.
Corrections and review
Editorial standards require transparent corrections, peer review citations, and ongoing literature audits. When new evidence changes a conclusion, we revise the article and note the date and nature of the change.